Editorial Policy

Authorship and responsibility

Articles use the byline “Typing Speed RPG Editorial Team.” This is an organization byline: Typing Speed RPG is the publisher and takes responsibility for the page. It is not the name of an invented individual, and it does not claim personal qualifications that have not been verified and disclosed. Our About page describes the project and the meaning of this byline.

Before publication, content should be checked against the current product where it describes a feature, formula, route, scoring rule, or practice workflow. The review also checks that the headline matches the page, instructions can be followed, material limitations are visible, and links support the claims near them. The publisher remains responsible when tools assist the work.

Research and source standards

For factual claims beyond the operation of our own product, we prefer primary and authoritative sources: original research papers, standards bodies, government or university material, official documentation, and direct publications from the organization being discussed. A secondary source may be used for context when it accurately represents the original work. Sources should be relevant to the exact claim and linked where a reader can inspect them.

We avoid turning an association into a guaranteed cause, generalizing a narrow study to every typist, or presenting a marketing statistic as settled evidence. If the available evidence is limited, dated, observational, or dependent on a particular population, the wording should reflect that uncertainty. Quotations must preserve the source’s meaning, and copied material is kept brief.

Product behavior is checked in the live or production-equivalent application. Typing formulas such as words per minute, accuracy, keystrokes per hour, and error counts are explained with their assumptions. Comparisons are most useful when test length, language, input method, keyboard layout, and text difficulty are comparable.

Recommendations, benchmarks, and limitations

Many practice pages recommend a sequence, session length, accuracy target, or threshold for changing difficulty. Unless a page cites an external standard, those values are Typing Speed RPG training heuristics designed to make the product give a clear next step. They are not universal scientific cutoffs, medical guidance, school placement criteria, or employer requirements.

We separate measurements from interpretation. A score reports what happened in one test; an improvement suggestion interprets that score under stated assumptions. Readers should account for fatigue, injury, accessibility needs, language, keyboard hardware, and task context. Practice should not require pain or unsafe repetition. Professional number-entry drills use fictional or synthetic examples and should never include real customer, patient, financial, employee, or other confidential data.

Advertising may appear on the site. An advertisement is not an editorial endorsement. If sponsored or paid editorial material is ever published, it should be clearly labeled so readers can distinguish it from independently produced guidance.

Automation and AI-assisted work

Software tools, including generative systems, may assist with research organization, drafting, editing, code, structured data, or quality checks. Tool output is not treated as a source and does not receive an author byline. Claims still need an inspectable basis, links must be checked, and product instructions must match the implemented experience. Typing Speed RPG remains responsible for material published under its organization byline.

We do not intentionally use automation to invent people, credentials, quotations, study results, personal experience, or user testimonials. Synthetic training examples should be presented as examples, not as real records or evidence of a real person’s outcome.

Updates and corrections

We review a page when a material product change, new source, reported error, or broken link makes a review necessary. A meaningful revision to the substance of an article should update its visible modified date and structured data. Small spelling, formatting, or accessibility fixes may be made without changing the editorial date because they do not alter the claim or recommendation.

To request a correction, use the contact form, put “Correction” in the subject, and include the page URL, the statement or behavior at issue, and any supporting source. We will assess whether the report changes accuracy, context, safety, attribution, or a reader’s likely understanding. Confirmed material errors are corrected in the page rather than preserved merely for appearance.

Questions about privacy or site use should refer to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use. This policy describes our intended editorial standard; it is not a promise that every page can never contain an error. Specific, well-supported reports help us improve it.